The U.C.C. was not designed for consumers as much as it was for merchants. It does not take into account the unique realities of consumer purchases. It does not provide sufficient protection for consumers. California was one of the first states to address this problem, and to this day California still has one of the country’s strongest lemon laws.
1970: Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act
Laws that benefit the individual inevitably come under attack by corporate interests. Somewhere between the needs of both there is fairness.
Under California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, manufacturers are entitled only to a reasonable number of attempts to repair defective consumer goods. If manufacturers or their agents are unsuccessful, they must either replace the goods or refund the purchase price. This is the basic remedy that nearly all lemon laws now provide.
The Song-Beverly Act is also meant to make it economically viable for consumers to bring warranty suits, by providing for an award of attorneys’ fees. The law bears the name of its authors in the California legislature, Alfred H. Song and Robert G. Beverly.
|