|
|
DescriptionNews was filled with GM to produce its most competitive cars and trucks in recent decades, along with its next 2011 Chevy Volt. But all this enthusiasm was immediately tempered by the bankruptcy filing by GM has come as a shock to many. The post-mortem on GM revealed GM's problems as infinite. Since the 1960s, GM has been mired in a combination of bad policy making bad decisions, bad design and engineering, and of course a lack of foresight.
A fleet of defective vehicles was the primary factor for achieving GM knee:
since early 1970, GM has imposed on all defective vehicles on the American public and refused to back their vehicles reliable and boring. That did not learn the lessons of Fiat, Citroen and Renault, whose cars unreliable disappeared from the roads in the United States. There were fewer and fewer buyers for Detroit, while the likes of Nissan, Honda and Toyota began offering similar vehicles that were more reliable and included the fact that manufacturers are willing to back their vehicles.
|
GM did not focus on improving its production techniques reliable cars: In 1980, while Toyota and others were busy refining their production techniques and manufacturing high quality vehicles at much lower prices, GM was the automation of workers in car factories. Customers left GM brands in mass and GM's market share fell more than 50 percent to 23 percent in 2007. Despite the difference in quality has been greatly reduced in recent years, wooing back a customer has been an uphill process to say the least. Crossover from GM, 2001, the Aztecs did not help either.
Blame it on bad policy making bad decisions, bad design and engineering, and of course, the lack of foresight: While Toyota has improved all models and has created two new divisions in the U.S. in the last 15 years, GM could not create anything half as good as Toyota, Lexus and Scion, Acura, Honda, Nissan, and Infinity and models of Mercedes, BMW and Audi. Hyundai in the U.S. arrived much later than GM, but he has won North American Car of the Year for its elegant design and reliable, Genesis. And GM had nothing to boast except insurance mass produced, low mileage, less people-size SUVs have grown to hate. If GM had stopped wasteful lobbying against consumer safety and the environment had been allocated yet and 1/10th of your advertising to create and improve the design of their vehicles, GM would have been able to produce the least one model of car in good year. Instead, while GM was producing some of the vehicles over the auto industry, like the Chevy Vega, a hundred miles away in Marysville, Ohio, Honda were busy producing world class cars and motorcycles. Nobody should blame the unions for this disparity. GM management has to answer for his bad policy making bad decisions, bad design and engineering, and of course, lack of foresight.
GM vehicles are all priced: GM vehicles are all priced, even with incentives. Interest rates are high too. And all the cars look like cars and trucks imitation of another manufacturer, but lack the elegance and reliability to attract customers to purchase them. Despite the knowledge that American cars are expensive and unreliable, GM has not reformed its ways to build better cars to compete with other manufacturers.
GM had nothing but bad design and poor quality vehicles to offer the client: The signs of making bad scare any prospective buyer are all present in GM. These include but are not limited to: Doors to be aligned with the gaps at the bottom, the pillar in the narrowing of a thin gap at the top, bottom brake pads, air leaks in the seals around the doors, bumpy rides, claustrophobic interiors, being thin, narrow legs, low head room to room high doors and small errors in polling and well-meant assembly in the under carriage. Nobody in their right mind would take to buy these cars that failed and are just rubbish at 90,000 miles, while Toyota small and Honda vehicles to go ahead with half the fuel that offers enticing alternatives.
Energy Crunch and shift in demand: GM has relied on vans and trucks for profits. An increase in energy prices had a major impact on the profitability of GM. Customers began to opt for smaller, less expensive and energy-efficient vehicles. GM had to deal with a loss of revenue and the accumulated fuel trucks that consume it. Only two things keep GM afloat, cheaper imported oil and interest rates artificially depressed.
Financial Meltdown: The automotive industry and their customers rely on credit. When limiting access to car loans or leases, sales fall off a cliff. And many analysts believe the total for 2008 could be as low as 10 million, the lowest in more than a decade.
Legacy costs: The costs of providing health care and pensions to tens of retired workers and their dependents, $ 2,000, a car enter the sticker price of any GM car and truck. Honda, Toyota and others have these costs. GM's hourly rate of automobile assembly work is approximately $ 75 per hour, while it is $ 40 to $ 45 for other car companies.
The global slowdown: GM operates in 41 countries and financial disease has spread worldwide like wildfire. Sales are down everywhere that has meant that GM has many wounds and blood that is all. On the cost side, the slowdown of the market has closed many of its factories and has eliminated most of the excess industry capacity of cars and trucks.
Today, with nothing more than questionable coaches $ 40,000 that may or may not even reach the road, it's no surprise that GM has already laid the groundwork for his departure. If by some remote chance, a new labor agreement is activated, GM may be able to produce a car less expensive and can get a more stable, with the benefits. But then the big question is "Will GM still around? The will of its vehicles also lemon around?
|
